Gendin’s Journal

Sidney Gendin

Oxymorons

July22

A few years ago I was having dinner with my friends Cathy and Jim Giles and had some reason for calling attention to “military intelligence,” which I referred to as an oxymoron. Gently, Cathy reprimanded and corrected me. The expression is not an oxymoron, after all. She explained why it isn’t, and she was perfectly right. I have thought back to that evening several times and now, finally, have decided to share with readers the benefit of that lesson.

An oxymoron is the deliberate joining of contradictory ideas. Wikipedia offers these examples:

a living death – sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind
a deafening silence – bitter-sweet – the bigger half
The Sounds of Silence (song title)
make haste slowly – he was conspicuous by his absence

But sometimes all we have is a funny collocation of terms – a joining of ideas that makes us smile in that it suggests incongruity.

friendly fire – airline food [army food, cafeteria food, etc.] – American culture – Apple tech support – mature male
athletic scholarship – California culture – classic rock and roll – civil strife
Just war [and civilized warfare] – Microsoft security – and the classic, example, military intelligence [and Central Intelligence Agency] – compassionate Conservative

The word “oxymoron” derives from the Greek Oxus = “sharp”, Moros = “dull” . Knowing that will put you one up on most professors and, for that reason, is worth knowing.

You can find a great collection of pseudo-oxymorons by CLICKING HERE. In among them are genuine oxymorons. Finding others is a lot more fun than finding pseudo-intellectual palindromes. These exist only to give you headaches and to prove to you that the people who discover them are smarter than you are.

And remember this: There is only one thing in life you need to remember to make your life worth living.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
posted under Language
5 Comments to

“Oxymorons”

  1. Avatar July 22nd, 2010 at 9:19 am Steve Leuchtman Says:

    RE: palindromes. You have cut me to the quick, sir. I am a great fan. Is “A slut nixes sex in Tulsa” really pseudo-intellectual? To quote Dr. Seuss, “You’re a mean one, Mr. Grinch.”


  2. Avatar July 22nd, 2010 at 10:27 am Sidney Gendin Says:

    It’s just a piece of cleverness and a waste of valuable brain cells. It doesn’t hep anybody be a better lawyer, philosopher, sanitation worker or rapist.


  3. Avatar July 22nd, 2010 at 11:52 am Steve Leuchtman Says:

    Okay, ya got me. And I’ll even go so far as to confess that there are times (but only on days ending in the letter “y”) when I suffer from “wanting to be the smartest guy in the room syndrome.” That said, clever is vastly underrated. I’ll take a good Far Side caption to a legal bon mot any day. But I have to quit on this exchange because, to quote a Far Side caption, my head is full.


  4. Avatar July 22nd, 2010 at 6:29 pm Steve Leuchtman Says:

    P.S.–How are palindromes any more of a “piece of cleverness and a waste of valuable brain cells” than either oxymorons or the George Carlin-type ersatz oxymorons?


  5. Avatar July 23rd, 2010 at 10:38 am Sidney Gendin Says:

    Oxymorons and pseudo=oxymorons are parts of everyday language and so we need them. Palindromes are clever, and that’s about it.


Email will not be published

Website example

Your Comment: